Regional Rail Link

Yes, more Regional Rail Link this month! First off, a V/Line train headed over the newly upgraded North Melbourne flyover bound for Southern Cross, avoiding the suburban trains down below.

The sharp curves catching V/Line unaware a few years later, when almost the entire VLocity train fleet was withdrawn from service due to wheel wear issues.

At Footscray the upgraded station was open to passengers, with the forecourt to Irving Street nicely landscaped.

And restoration work underway on the heritage listed station buildings.

There were also works happening in the background – a new traction power substation was under construction, so that extra suburban services could use the track capacity freed up by giving V/Line trains their own route into the city.

But despite the infrastructure upgrades, little use was made of the extra capacity – by 2018 only half of the extra capacity was being used.

And still on the trains

I photographed a slice of the past out at Beaconsfield, where the 1950s-era overhead wiring and traction power tie station was still in place. It’s all since been replaced by a modern power supply as part of the work to support the rollout of High Capacity Metro Trains to the Pakenham line.

At Flagstaff station I found a set of defective myki gates under repair – presumably from being smashed open by a fare evader.

While over at Southern Cross were Authorised Officers in their new military-style vests, looking out for the next person trying the same trick.

On the trams

A decade ago City Circle trams were still in the maroon and gold livery, and the ‘shard’ at Federation Square had yet to be demolished for the Metro Tunnel entrance.

The original Z1 class trams were also still running down Swanston Street, with only two doors per side and dinky little sliding windows.

East Preston Depot was still open to serve the high floor B2 class trams used on route 11 and 86 – all since replaced by the low floor E class trams based out of ‘New’ Preston Depot.

While testing of the new E class trams was still continuing – I found one at the route 57 terminus in West Maribyrnong on a late night test run.

Meanwhile on Collins Street, things were going backwards – passengers having to step up to trams from street level.

The platform stops closed so they could be dug up and raised to current standards, despite only being a decade old.

Buses

Transdev had taken over from National Bus, but the transition into the new PTV colour scheme was going in fits and starts.

While route 286 through the back streets of Blackburn was removed, but then a few months later, reintroduced as route 271.

Another changed bus stop can be found at Melbourne Airport – the route 901 service to Broadmeadows and eventually Frankston once stopped outside Qantas terminal T1.

But these days it’s hidden at the far end of the ‘Ground Transport Hub’, a long walk from terminal 4.

And something different

My next stop at Melbourne Airport a decade ago was Brisbane.

Catching a train from Brisbane Airport into the city.

To Roma Street – the Brisbane Transit Centre since demolished for the Cross River Rail project.

While I was in town, I photographed some of their first generation EMU trains.

The Merivale Bridge.

And buses on the network of Brisbane City Council operated busways.

Which include underground bus stations.

Passengers boarding buses from air conditioned platforms.

But the reason for my visit was a trip on The Sunlander.

A locomotive hauled sleeping train that ran from Brisbane to Cairns until December 2014.

When I woke up the next day, we were well into cane country.

But the trip north is a long one – not arriving into Cairns until that evening.

While in Cairns I rode the Skyrail Rainforest Cableway up to Kuranda, and with some lucky timing spotted a Kuranda-bound train stopped at Barron Falls.

After lunch, it was time to head to Kuranda station, where I found a signal box still in service.

And caught the Kuranda Scenic Railway back down the range to Cairns.

Unfortunately I didn’t have time for the four day journey on the Savannahlander, but I did see it arrive back into Cairns.

But it was time to fly home via Sydney – my plane passing over the Hawkesbury River railway bridge on our descent.

The Inner West Light Rail

And a Pacific National container train shunting the freight yard at Cooks River.

Time to change planes, and soon enough I was back in Melbourne – greeted at the airport luggage claim by propaganda for the Napthine Government’s East West Link, CityLink Tulla Widening, and an unfunded Melbourne Airport Rail Link.

A decade on we’ve gotten the west half of the East West Link, the Tullamarine Freeway has been widening, and airport rail – still talking.

Footnote

Here you can find the rest of my ‘photos from ten years ago‘ series.

Post retrieved by 35.215.163.46 using

The post Photos from ten years ago: August 2014 appeared first on Waking up in Geelong.

The relevant portion of the article is this:

Metro’s five-year plan includes a target to cut power use by 10 per cent for each kilometre of train travel. It aims to achieve this through the use of regenerative braking technology, which uses a train’s motor and brakes to put power back into the overhead wiring to be used by other trains.

But little progress has been made in the two years since it put the power-saving proposal to government, with the high cost and practical difficulty of applying the technology to Melbourne’s rail system being blamed.

Metro said a computer simulation on the hilly Lilydale line had shown the energy regenerative braking technology would save electricity.

”This showed that once the technology is affordable, a business case can be made so that it’s commercially viable,” spokeswoman Larisa Tait said. ”The technology is in its infancy and is currently very expensive and we are waiting for the cost of the storage units to reduce.”

Additionally, many of the electrical substations that help power the network and which were built in the 1920s when Melbourne’s rail lines were first electrified are not equipped to handle regenerated electricity.

On the subject of regenerative braking, the spokesperson at Metro is poorly informed – the technology is well proven overseas and widely deployed, as this 2007 article from the Railway Gazette details how Japanese railways have taken advantage of it:

Regenerative braking became popular for normal service braking even in the DC traction era of the late-1960s, when field chopper control was introduced by many private railways. Metros followed in the 1970s when armature chopper control was introduced. In the 1980s, AC traction motors replaced DC motors for almost all EMUs and regenerative braking capability became inherent in the power control circuits. Except for special circumstances, dynamic braking where energy is dissipated in resistance grids was abandoned because of the additional weight, cost and potential danger of fire.

In addition Melbourne existing Siemens and XTrapolis train fleets are already equipped with regenerative braking, but unfortunately in Melbourne it isn’t used as intended – most of the time the energy captured from the stopping train is thrown away because no other trains are around to accept the current.

The Railway Gazette has more to say on the issues facing the reuse of energy:

In regenerative braking the current is returned to the overhead line or third rail. Until relatively recently, regenerative braking was mainly employed on DC electrified lines. However, braking is dependent on the ability of other trains on the same route to accept the current. This is known as receptivity and is affected by a number of variables, including location, traffic density and line voltage. On a busy suburban service at peak times receptivity can be as high as 15%. On a line with long sections between stations and low service frequency it can fall below 5%.

Early implementations of regenerative braking used large resistor grids in the substation to ‘burn off’ surplus power from the system as heat, which increased the receptivity of the overhead system, but with the side effect of letting the generated energy go to waste.

However, a solution to that problem is on the horizon, and this might be the ‘technology is in its infancy’ that the Metro spokesperson spoke of. Trials of batteries at substations for energy storage have been carried out in the USA, as have flywheel based systems onboard trains, and supercapacitors onboard trams.

So what about the comment from Tony Morton, president of the Public Transport Users Association?

We still operate a 1920s vintage power-supply system for our trains. Fifteen-hundred volts DC was state of the art when it was first put in, but virtually all of the other 1500-volt DC infrastructure around the world – or certainly in the developed world – has since been upgraded to the contemporary standard.

That is a half truth – three major users of the same 1500 volt DC system used in Melbourne are:

• Shanghai Metro – the longest metro system in the world
• Hong Kong’s Mass Transit Railway – the go to example of how to run a railway
• Japan’s commuter railways – famous worldwide for on time trains

Stating that Melbourne’s choice of railway electrification system is holding us back makes as much sense as saying that traffic lights hold back our road network – both are technologies perfected decades ago, and both have limitations compared to the latest developments, but pretending they are the reason for Melbourne’s transport network being in the stone ages is a misinterpretation.

Footnote

Despite what I have written above – Melbourne’s rail network does rely on a clapped out power supply system – the following figures are from a 2007 report on the issues and challenges facing it:

Franchise renewals per year, as fractions of total:

• AC circuit breakers: 3 out of 126 (2.4% pa)
• Rectifier units: 2 out of 81 (2.4% pa)
• DC circuit breakers: 10 out of 457(2.2% pa)
• Signal transformers: 1 out of 67 (1.6% pa)
• Frequency converter units: 0 out of 6 (0% pa)

If design life is 30 years then 3.3% pa is the benchmark.

And the problems caused by a lack of infrastructure renewal:

• Increasing maintenance debt
• Maintenance level does not account for increasing capacity
• No augmentation to match future demands
• Compounding factors: maintenance debt + no capacity increase = High level of deferred costs

Deferred maintenance of railway infrastructure – where have we heard that before?

Post retrieved by 35.215.163.46 using

The post Regenerative braking and Melbourne’s trains appeared first on Waking up in Geelong.